This EV Company Lost $25 Billion. Why Won’t China Let It Die?

Subtitle: Its financials scream bankruptcy, but Beijing keeps writing checks. There’s a hidden strategy here that the West isn’t seeing.

Meet NIO, once hailed as the “Tesla of China.” Today, on Chinese social media, it’s being called a “ticking time bomb.” A recent viral analysis of NIO’s finances revealed some shocking numbers: a debt-to-asset ratio of 92.55% and a current ratio of just 0.84, meaning it can’t even cover its short-term debts. For any normal company, this would be a death sentence.

You might think, “So what? Another overhyped EV startup is failing.” But this isn’t just a story about one company’s balance sheet. This is a live-fire demonstration of how China is rewriting the rules of capitalism to win the future of industry. It’s a story about how a global superpower is ignoring profitability to achieve a much bigger, more strategic goal. Whether you’re in the auto industry, an investor, or just want to understand the future of global competition, cracking this code is essential.

I’m an industry analyst stationed on the ground here in China, witnessing the front lines of the auto-wars every day. The numbers I’m sharing are public facts from NIO, XPeng, and Li Auto’s own financial reports. But numbers don’t tell the whole story. I’m here to tell you about the “invisible hand” of the state that I see at play—the story that exists behind the spreadsheets.

On paper, NIO is a failure. But here’s my question: What if NIO’s “failure” isn’t a failure at all, but a calculated part of a much larger, more patient Chinese strategy? By the end of this article, you’ll understand why NIO will likely never go bankrupt—and what that means for the rest of us.

---

1. The Fall of a Star Pupil: NIO’s Glorious Past and Grim Present

The story exploded after a Chinese TikToker, prefacing his video with “Praise is meaningless if criticism isn’t free,” dissected NIO’s financial statements for his millions of followers. The verdict was brutal.

• Current Ratio of 0.84: This means NIO only has 84 cents in liquid assets for every dollar of short-term debt. Its rivals, Li Auto and XPeng, stand at a much healthier 1.87 and 1.21, respectively.
• Debt-to-Asset Ratio of 92.55%: Over 92% of the company’s assets are financed by debt. If there’s even a slight overvaluation of its assets, the company is technically insolvent. Compare that to Li Auto (55.31%) and XPeng (65.46%).

It’s a dramatic fall from grace. NIO was once the standard-bearer for China’s EV ambitions. It conquered the Nürburgring with its EP9 electric supercar, beating records set by Lamborghini and McLaren. It hosted lavish “NIO Day” events that rivaled Apple keynotes and pioneered the revolutionary concept of battery-swapping stations.

But all that innovation, R&D, and glitzy marketing never translated into profit. Over the past decade, its cumulative losses have exceeded an eye-watering $25 billion USD. More than ten years after its founding, it still can’t sustain itself.

2. The State Steps In: The Zombie Company That Refuses to Die

NIO was already on the brink of collapse in 2020. It wasn’t the market that saved it; it was the state. The municipal government of Hefei injected over $1 billion, and since then, a steady stream of cash from various state-owned enterprises (SOEs) has kept the company afloat.

The most recent investments this year came from entities that are 100% state-owned, controlled by the Hefei and Anhui provincial governments. In essence, NIO is being kept alive by Chinese taxpayers.

This is where the TikToker’s sharpest questions hit home:
“Why isn’t this money being used to improve school cafeterias or local hospitals?”
“If the state will always bail them out, what incentive do the executives have to actually turn a profit?”

These are logical questions based on Western business principles. But the answer lies in defying that very logic.

3. A “Failure” by Design: China’s Real Grand Strategy

My conclusion from being here on the ground is this: The Chinese government is fully aware that NIO is a money pit. It continues to invest because it doesn’t see NIO as a mere car company. It sees it as a strategic asset.

First, NIO is a tool to establish a global industry standard.
Through NIO’s battery-swap stations, China is making a bold play to own the global standard for EV refueling. It may not be profitable now, but building thousands of these stations is a massive investment in future infrastructure. It’s no different than the U.S. government’s early investment in ARPANET (the internet’s precursor). The goal isn’t NIO’s profitability; it’s dominance over the entire battery-swapping ecosystem.

Second, NIO is a spearhead to conquer the premium market.
For decades, “Made in China” has struggled with a reputation for being cheap. NIO was designed from day one to compete with Mercedes-Benz and BMW. While it’s losing billions, it has succeeded in planting a powerful idea in the global consciousness: China can build world-class luxury cars. That brand equity is a national asset, and the state is willing to pay the price for it.

Third, NIO is the “catfish” that strengthens the entire domestic market.
By keeping a formidable, albeit struggling, competitor like NIO in the game, the government forces other Chinese companies like Li Auto, XPeng, and BYD to innovate faster and cut costs more aggressively. Instead of letting NIO fail, they use it to create a hyper-competitive domestic environment, ultimately making the entire Chinese EV industry stronger. This is known as the “catfish effect.”

Conclusion: What Are We Really Competing Against?

Let’s return to the initial question: Why won’t NIO go bankrupt?
The answer is simple: NIO is no longer just a company.

It is a strategic instrument, a living experiment funded by the immense will and capital of the Chinese state. It cannot be judged by the normal metrics of profit and loss.

The real question for global automakers and policymakers isn’t, “When will NIO fail?”
The real question is:
“How do you compete with a rival who doesn’t need to make money?”

That is the stark reality of the new global marketplace. NIO’s financial “failure” might just be the most successful, and most dangerous, strategy of them all.